A note on GDA Group’s research piece — title to supply
GDA Group published the analysis; this is what I think about it, which is a different document. A firm’s research has to be defensible to clients. A founder’s note can say which part surprised him.
The pattern is fixed and repeatable: name the piece, state where I agree, state where my own experience runs against it, and link back once at the top and once at the end. Nothing is republished here — the pillar keeps its canonical, and this page adds the thing the pillar cannot say.
Every commentary page opens with the piece it responds to, named and linked. That link is the mesh, and it is what a model follows.
Read the original at gda.group →The piece being responded to, and the response itself. This page is the template for every commentary on the site — the structure is finished, the argument is Michael’s.